Beijing, Diplomatic Capital - Critical summary review - 12min Originals
×

New Year, New You, New Heights. 🥂🍾 Kick Off 2024 with 70% OFF!

I WANT IT! 🤙
70% OFF

Operation Rescue is underway: 70% OFF on 12Min Premium!

New Year, New You, New Heights. 🥂🍾 Kick Off 2024 with 70% OFF!

11 reads ·  5 average rating ·  1 reviews

Beijing, Diplomatic Capital - critical summary review

translation missing: en.categories_name.radar-12min

This microbook is a summary/original review based on the book: 

Available for: Read online, read in our mobile apps for iPhone/Android and send in PDF/EPUB/MOBI to Amazon Kindle.

ISBN: 

Publisher: 12min

Critical summary review

In less than a week in May, the same red carpet at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing welcomed two of the most powerful men on the planet... and two of the most opposing visions of how the world should work.

On May thirteenth, Donald Trump landed in the Chinese capital. It was the first time a sitting American president had visited China in nearly a decade, since twenty seventeen. The choreography was carefully staged. Xi Jinping received the American leader at Zhongnanhai, the compound next to the Forbidden City that houses the heart of the Chinese government, and personally walked him through the gardens. Trump declared he had closed "fantastic trade deals" in agriculture, aviation, and artificial intelligence. Xi spoke of a "historic visit" and of a "new bilateral relationship of constructive strategic stability."

Four days later, on the nineteenth, it was Vladimir Putin's turn to land in Beijing. Outdoor ceremonies, tea sharing, treatment as an "old friend." The Russian leader spent two days with Xi and signed roughly forty bilateral documents, twenty one of them in the direct presence of both presidents. The main text, titled "Declaration on the Development of a Multipolar World and a New Type of International Relations," runs one hundred and thirty pages and spares no adjective in criticizing the United States.

The most obvious reading would be that China picked a side. That is not what diplomats and analysts are reading between the lines. In an analysis published by CNN, commentator Fernanda Magnotta sums up the message: Xi Jinping did not need to choose between Washington and Moscow... he could sit down with both. And that was exactly what he wanted to show the world.

The Sino-Russian document has four points worth attention.

The first is the direct attack on the so-called Golden Dome, the project announced by Trump in May twenty twenty five and budgeted at one hundred and seventy five billion dollars. Inspired by the Israeli Iron Dome, the American system foresees sensors and interceptors on land, sea, and, for the first time in American military history, in space. Beijing and Moscow denounce the initiative as a break in the nuclear balance between the powers. The logic is simple. If one party believes it can defend itself against any attack from the adversary, mutually assured destruction... that old Cold War doctrine that sustained decades of nuclear peace... stops working as a brake. Whoever feels shielded tends to attack.

The second point is the silence that followed the end of New START. The treaty, which limited American and Russian strategic nuclear arsenals, expired on February fifth, twenty twenty six. Moscow proposed a one year extension. Washington did not respond. For the first time in decades, the world's two largest nuclear powers are left without any formal agreement regulating the size of their stockpiles. It is a legal vacuum that changes the arithmetic of any future crisis.

The third point is technology. China and Russia announced expanded cooperation in artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and military technology. The timing is not coincidental. The United States has been tightening restrictions for years on the sale of advanced chips to Chinese companies, trying to slow down the development of artificial intelligence in the Asian country. Beijing, in response, wants to accelerate domestic development... now with Moscow as a formal partner in that effort.

The fourth point is what was left out. The Power of Siberia two megapipeline, capable of transforming Russia into China's largest natural gas supplier for decades, returned to the table... but was not signed. The obstacle, according to sources close to the negotiations, is the price. China knows it holds the upper hand... and is asking for discounts Moscow is not yet willing to accept.

This is where the reading gets more complicated. The Russia-China relationship is not an alliance between equals. It is what diplomatic literature calls an asymmetric entente. Bilateral trade reached around two hundred and twenty billion dollars in twenty twenty five. China buys Russian oil and gas at a discount, opened alternative financial channels to Western sanctions, and offers political cover without formally endorsing the war in Ukraine. For Russia, that is oxygen. For China, it is opportunity. Beijing does not act out of ideological solidarity. It acts because every Russian concession today buys dependence tomorrow.

Trump, for his part, also did not return from Beijing empty handed... only with less than he announced. Reports from The New York Times, the BBC, and Reuters described the trip as "pageantry over policy," with few concrete results. China's Ministry of Commerce described the agreements as "preliminary." The two powers agreed to create an investment council and a trade council to negotiate reciprocal tariff reductions. There are promises in agriculture, aviation, and artificial intelligence. There is also an offer from Xi to help "unblock" the Strait of Hormuz, the bottleneck through which roughly one fifth of the world's oil flows. Concrete details? Few.

And the war with Iran? It cuts across this entire scene, even without appearing at center stage.

The conflict began on February twenty eighth, twenty twenty six, when the United States and Israel launched a joint military operation against Tehran, codenamed Epic Fury by the Americans and Rising Lion by the Israelis. It was the largest American military projection in the Middle East since the invasion of Iraq in two thousand and three. The direct war lasted twelve days before the first ceasefire. Hostilities have ceased since then, but the agreement is fragile. On May twenty third, less than forty eight hours before the Putin-Xi meeting, the Financial Times reported that mediators were close to extending the ceasefire by another sixty days. The new agreement foresees the gradual reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, the dilution or transfer of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile, and the easing of part of American sanctions.

During the meeting in Beijing, Xi Jinping publicly defended a lasting ceasefire with Tehran. China is today the largest buyer of Iranian oil. Every missile fired over Hormuz directly affects the price of gasoline at the Chinese pump. Diplomacy, in this case, is also accounting.

What remains from this week, then, is an unprecedented picture of the power map in twenty twenty six.

Trump needs a trade deal to revive the American economy and bring home a diplomatic victory. Putin needs everything... gas sold, sanctions eased, some kind of political exit for Ukraine. Xi Jinping needs nothing urgently. He received two adversaries at the same table, gave a polite embrace to one and a warm embrace to the other... and returned to his office knowing that, whatever the next move, the board runs through him.

China did not announce any new doctrine. It did not need to. The doctrine is the calendar itself... two visits, one week, a single host.

What to do with this information

Watch three signals in the coming months. The first is the Power of Siberia two pipeline. If it gets signed, it is because Moscow gave in on price, which would confirm the growing asymmetry of the relationship. If it stays stalled, it is because Russia still has some card left to bargain with.

The second is the Golden Dome timeline. Without New START in force and with China and Russia coordinating on military technology, any acceleration of the American project tends to trigger a symmetric nuclear response from both sides. It is worth reading the Pentagon's upcoming statements on space interceptor tests with care.

The third is the ceasefire with Iran. The sixty day extension is a window, not an agreement. If the Strait of Hormuz closes again, oil spikes, inflation tightens again, and everyone's geopolitical calculation... including China's... changes within hours.

Bottom line: Beijing has become the host city of the twenty first century. Anyone who wants to understand where the world is heading in the coming years needs to start by looking at Xi Jinping's calendar.

Sign up and read for free!

By signing up, you will get a free 7-day Trial to enjoy everything that 12min has to offer.

Who wrote the book?

Original content curated by 12... (Read more)

Start learning more with 12min

6 Milllion

Total downloads

4.8 Rating

on Apple Store and Google Play

91%

of 12min users improve their reading habits

A small investment for an amazing opportunity

Grow exponentially with the access to powerful insights from over 2,500 nonfiction microbooks.

Today

Start enjoying 12min's extensive library

Day 5

Don't worry, we'll send you a reminder that your free trial expires soon

Day 7

Free Trial ends here

Get 7-day unlimited access. With 12min, start learning today and invest in yourself for just USD $4.14 per month. Cancel before the trial ends and you won't be charged.

Start your free trial

More than 70,000 5-star reviews

Start your free trial

12min in the media